βππ₯ππ πππ πΈπ‘π ππ πππ₯πππ€ πππ βπ ππππππ€
Photo
For those Idiotic Protestants who still Accuse Our Blessed Mother of Not Being a Virgin .
First take a look at the bible.....
1 Corinthians 15:6 (NRSVCE)
βΆThen he appeared to more than five hundred brothers and sisters at one time, most of whom are still alive, though some have died.
OBVIOUSLY JESUS DIDN'T HAVE 500 BROTHERS .
The reason being the New Testament was written in Greek and ... Greek and Aramaic Both have No Word equivalent for "Cousin". And they substitute the word Brother(Adelphos) as the closest possible term . Even today in English we Call People "Bro" or "Brother" , This not make them Our Real Uterine brothers Obviously π. So this is again Protestants being Stupid .
Even Calvin used to establish the fact of Maryβs perpetual virginity, which he believed (based primarily on Scripture alone),as did Luther, Zwingli, Bullinger, and many later prominent, theologically conservative, and scholarly Protestants (such as John Wesley).
By comparing Matthew 27:56, Mark 15:40, and John 19:25, we find
that James and Joseph β mentioned in Matthew 13:55 with Simon and
Jude as Jesusβ βbrothersβ β are also called sons of Mary, wife of
Clopas. This other Mary (Matthew 27:61, 28:1) is called our Ladyβs adelphe in John 19:25 (it isnβt likely that there were two women
named βMaryβ in one family β thus even this usage apparently means
βcousinβ or more distant relative).
"αΌΞ΄Ξ΅Ξ»ΟΞΏΞ― / αδΡλΟΟΟ" (adelphoi/Adelphous) may have well been the Word used for "Brothers/Brother" in Greek Both for Blood brothers and Cousins . But when "ΟΟ Ξ³Ξ³Ξ΅Ξ½Ξ΅αΏ¦ΟΞΉΞ½" (syngeneusin) is Applied.... It always Means A Cousin or Relative And Never and a Blood Brother!!
Matthew 13:55-56 and Mark 6:3
mention Simon, Jude, and βsistersβ along with James and Joseph,
calling all adelphoi. Since we know for sure that at least James and
Joseph are not Jesusβ blood brothers, the most likely interpretation of
Matthew 13:55 is that all these βbrothersβ are cousins, according to the linguistic conventions discussed above.
First take a look at the bible.....
1 Corinthians 15:6 (NRSVCE)
βΆThen he appeared to more than five hundred brothers and sisters at one time, most of whom are still alive, though some have died.
OBVIOUSLY JESUS DIDN'T HAVE 500 BROTHERS .
The reason being the New Testament was written in Greek and ... Greek and Aramaic Both have No Word equivalent for "Cousin". And they substitute the word Brother(Adelphos) as the closest possible term . Even today in English we Call People "Bro" or "Brother" , This not make them Our Real Uterine brothers Obviously π. So this is again Protestants being Stupid .
Even Calvin used to establish the fact of Maryβs perpetual virginity, which he believed (based primarily on Scripture alone),as did Luther, Zwingli, Bullinger, and many later prominent, theologically conservative, and scholarly Protestants (such as John Wesley).
By comparing Matthew 27:56, Mark 15:40, and John 19:25, we find
that James and Joseph β mentioned in Matthew 13:55 with Simon and
Jude as Jesusβ βbrothersβ β are also called sons of Mary, wife of
Clopas. This other Mary (Matthew 27:61, 28:1) is called our Ladyβs adelphe in John 19:25 (it isnβt likely that there were two women
named βMaryβ in one family β thus even this usage apparently means
βcousinβ or more distant relative).
"αΌΞ΄Ξ΅Ξ»ΟΞΏΞ― / αδΡλΟΟΟ" (adelphoi/Adelphous) may have well been the Word used for "Brothers/Brother" in Greek Both for Blood brothers and Cousins . But when "ΟΟ Ξ³Ξ³Ξ΅Ξ½Ξ΅αΏ¦ΟΞΉΞ½" (syngeneusin) is Applied.... It always Means A Cousin or Relative And Never and a Blood Brother!!
Matthew 13:55-56 and Mark 6:3
mention Simon, Jude, and βsistersβ along with James and Joseph,
calling all adelphoi. Since we know for sure that at least James and
Joseph are not Jesusβ blood brothers, the most likely interpretation of
Matthew 13:55 is that all these βbrothersβ are cousins, according to the linguistic conventions discussed above.
DEFENSE OF OUR LADY'S PERPETUAL VIRGINITY β€οΈβοΈβοΈ
βππ₯ππ πππ πΈπ‘π ππ πππ₯πππ€ πππ βπ ππππππ€
For those Idiotic Protestants who still Accuse Our Blessed Mother of Not Being a Virgin . First take a look at the bible..... 1 Corinthians 15:6 (NRSVCE) βΆThen he appeared to more than five hundred brothers and sisters at one time, most of whom are stillβ¦
SHORT DEFENSE OF MARY'S PERPETUAL VIRGINITY.
A SHORT version π
X---X---X---X---Xβ--X---X---X---X
A Long version π
LONG DEFENSE OF MARYβS PERPETUAL VIRGINITY
A SHORT version π
X---X---X---X---Xβ--X---X---X---X
A Long version π
LONG DEFENSE OF MARYβS PERPETUAL VIRGINITY
At Chalcedon, Pope St Leo the Great was the one who drafted the main document, the Tome, and it was widely hailed by the bishops in attendance as masterful defense of orthodoxy. Pope Leo the Great's authoritative role at the council exemplifies the recognition of Roman Supremacy. His "Tome" was accepted as a standard of orthodoxy, and his legates presided over the council, affirming the pope's authority . To Quote Session II of the Acts of the Council records:
βAfter the reading of the foregoing epistle [The Tome of Leo], the most reverend bishops cried out: βThis is the faith of the fathers! This is the faith of the apostles! So we all believe! Thus the orthodox believe! Anathema to him who does not thus believe! Peter has spoken thus through Leo! . . . This is the true faith! Those of us who are orthodox thus believe! This is the faith of the Fathers!ββ (Acts of the Council, session 2 [A.D. 451]).
βAfter the reading of the foregoing epistle [The Tome of Leo], the most reverend bishops cried out: βThis is the faith of the fathers! This is the faith of the apostles! So we all believe! Thus the orthodox believe! Anathema to him who does not thus believe! Peter has spoken thus through Leo! . . . This is the true faith! Those of us who are orthodox thus believe! This is the faith of the Fathers!ββ (Acts of the Council, session 2 [A.D. 451]).
βππ₯ππ πππ πΈπ‘π ππ πππ₯πππ€ πππ βπ ππππππ€
At Chalcedon, Pope St Leo the Great was the one who drafted the main document, the Tome, and it was widely hailed by the bishops in attendance as masterful defense of orthodoxy. Pope Leo the Great's authoritative role at the council exemplifies the recognitionβ¦
Papal Supremacy at the Council of Chalcedon βοΈβοΈ
Papal Supremacy has always been there since the early Church. But sadly the orthodoxes aren't able to grasp it's true meaning. The Pope is Servei Servum Dei. The successor of the Prince of the Apostles.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Papal Supremacy at the Third Council of Constantinople. βοΈ
GUYS THIS IS URGENT
One of our sisters in christ from an Islamic country is being forced to marry a Muslim
Is there any way we can help her ?
One of our sisters in christ from an Islamic country is being forced to marry a Muslim
Is there any way we can help her ?
βππ₯ππ πππ πΈπ‘π ππ πππ₯πππ€ πππ βπ ππππππ€
GUYS THIS IS URGENT One of our sisters in christ from an Islamic country is being forced to marry a Muslim Is there any way we can help her ?
Please pray that she is able to Find a Way Out without having to Submit to The evil of Islam
βππ₯ππ πππ πΈπ‘π ππ πππ₯πππ€ πππ βπ ππππππ€
GUYS THIS IS URGENT One of our sisters in christ from an Islamic country is being forced to marry a Muslim Is there any way we can help her ?
She is one of the Major Admins on this channel and if this channel has helped you its probably been because of Her π .
Please if you can Help to get her to somewhere safe as we are trying . (THE Air fare Currently Costs 541$) if possible to Chip in so that we can save her , or if possible in any other way )
Please reach out to Me @TEMPLARBROTHER if you wanna help her
Please if you can Help to get her to somewhere safe as we are trying . (THE Air fare Currently Costs 541$) if possible to Chip in so that we can save her , or if possible in any other way )
Please reach out to Me @TEMPLARBROTHER if you wanna help her
βππ₯ππ πππ πΈπ‘π ππ πππ₯πππ€ πππ βπ ππππππ€
She is one of the Major Admins on this channel and if this channel has helped you its probably been because of Her π . Please if you can Help to get her to somewhere safe as we are trying . (THE Air fare Currently Costs 541$) if possible to Chip in so thatβ¦
Please help us if you can . This is a genuine message from the admin
βππ₯ππ πππ πΈπ‘π ππ πππ₯πππ€ πππ βπ ππππππ€
She is one of the Major Admins on this channel and if this channel has helped you its probably been because of Her π . Please if you can Help to get her to somewhere safe as we are trying . (THE Air fare Currently Costs 541$) if possible to Chip in so thatβ¦
Even if you can Help in a Small way... it would be appreciated to save her life
Forwarded from Ecce Verbum
Is Peter the Rock or Christ?
Peter is the visible head of the Church, and Christ the invisible eternal Head of the Church. But these two are one, so that the Church does not have two heads. This mystical unity between Christ and His Vicar is crucial to the understanding of the Roman Pontiff as the head of the Church, the body of Christ.
Pius XII: βChrist and His Vicar constitute one only Headβ of the one Church [Mystical Body of Christ 40]. Other sources (Unam Sanctam; Roman Catechism) say the same thing, with Pope Boniface in Unam Sanctam rejecting out right that the Church has two heads (βlike a monsterβ). Peter (and each successor) is the visible head, and Christ the eternal (invisible, we say) Head, but their unity gives the Pope divine authority, despite being a fallen sinner with a limited earthly reign.
Peter (and each successor) is the visible Rock and Christ is the eternal invisible Rock. And so, just as the clearly taught mystical unity between Christ and His Vicar constitutes one only Head, not two, this same mystical unity constitutes one only Rock: Christ and the Roman Pontiff. As for Peter, βfor ever he lives and presides and exercises judgment in his successors the bishops of the Holy Roman See, which he founded and consecrated with his bloodβ (Pastor Aeternus 2, 2), and so Peter never ceases to be the Rock, in the sense that he presides through his successors.
Leo XIII teaches in Satis Cognitum 12:
βAnd since all Christians must be closely united in the communion of one immutable faith, Christ the Lord, in virtue of His prayers, obtained for Peter that in the fulfilment of his office he should never fall away from the faith. βBut I have asked for thee that thy faith fail notβ (Luke xxii., 32), and He furthermore commanded him to impart light and strength to his brethren as often as the need should arise: βConfirm thy brethrenβ (Ibid.). He willed then that he whom He had designated as the foundation of the Church should be the defense of its faith. βCould not Christ who confided to him the Kingdom by His own authority have strengthened the faith of one whom He designated a rock to show the foundation of the Church?β (S. Ambrosius, De Fide, lib. iv., n. 56).
βFor this reason Jesus Christ willed that Peter should participate in certain names, signs of great things which properly belong to Himself alone: in order that identity of titles should show identity of power. So He who is Himself βthe chief corner-stone in whom all the building being framed together, groweth up in a holy temple in the Lordβ (Eph. ii., 21), placed Peter as it were a stone to support the Church. βWhen he heard βthou art a rock,β he was ennobled by the announcement. Although he is a rock, not as Christ is a rock, but as Peter is a rock. For Christ is by His very being an immovable rock; Peter only through this rock. Christ imparts His gifts, and is not exhaustedβ¦. He is a priest, and makes priests. He is a rock, and constitutes a rockβ (Hom. de Poenitentia, n. 4 in Appendice opp. S. Basilii [attributed to St. Basil])
Pope Leo XIII teaches that Christ is the Rock on which the Church is founded, just as Christ is also the Head of the Church. But Peter and his successors are each Rock and Head due to their mystical unity with Christ. Peter is Head and Rock only through Christ. Since the Church is the body of Christ, Peter alone cannot be its Head; Christ must be the Head of His own body. But Christ gifted the Church with a visible Head, united to himself as one Head, and the same for the foundational Rock of the Church. That Rock is Peter and his successors, not Peter alone historically, but Peter in his successors. But Peter can only be the foundational Rock of the Body of Christ through Christ, the Cornerstone of the Church. These are not two different roles, Cornerstone and Rock. Rather, Christ is the Rock or Cornerstone (in Hebrew βHead of the Cornerβ) and so is Peter, through his mystical unity with Christ.
Peter is the visible head of the Church, and Christ the invisible eternal Head of the Church. But these two are one, so that the Church does not have two heads. This mystical unity between Christ and His Vicar is crucial to the understanding of the Roman Pontiff as the head of the Church, the body of Christ.
Pius XII: βChrist and His Vicar constitute one only Headβ of the one Church [Mystical Body of Christ 40]. Other sources (Unam Sanctam; Roman Catechism) say the same thing, with Pope Boniface in Unam Sanctam rejecting out right that the Church has two heads (βlike a monsterβ). Peter (and each successor) is the visible head, and Christ the eternal (invisible, we say) Head, but their unity gives the Pope divine authority, despite being a fallen sinner with a limited earthly reign.
Peter (and each successor) is the visible Rock and Christ is the eternal invisible Rock. And so, just as the clearly taught mystical unity between Christ and His Vicar constitutes one only Head, not two, this same mystical unity constitutes one only Rock: Christ and the Roman Pontiff. As for Peter, βfor ever he lives and presides and exercises judgment in his successors the bishops of the Holy Roman See, which he founded and consecrated with his bloodβ (Pastor Aeternus 2, 2), and so Peter never ceases to be the Rock, in the sense that he presides through his successors.
Leo XIII teaches in Satis Cognitum 12:
βAnd since all Christians must be closely united in the communion of one immutable faith, Christ the Lord, in virtue of His prayers, obtained for Peter that in the fulfilment of his office he should never fall away from the faith. βBut I have asked for thee that thy faith fail notβ (Luke xxii., 32), and He furthermore commanded him to impart light and strength to his brethren as often as the need should arise: βConfirm thy brethrenβ (Ibid.). He willed then that he whom He had designated as the foundation of the Church should be the defense of its faith. βCould not Christ who confided to him the Kingdom by His own authority have strengthened the faith of one whom He designated a rock to show the foundation of the Church?β (S. Ambrosius, De Fide, lib. iv., n. 56).
βFor this reason Jesus Christ willed that Peter should participate in certain names, signs of great things which properly belong to Himself alone: in order that identity of titles should show identity of power. So He who is Himself βthe chief corner-stone in whom all the building being framed together, groweth up in a holy temple in the Lordβ (Eph. ii., 21), placed Peter as it were a stone to support the Church. βWhen he heard βthou art a rock,β he was ennobled by the announcement. Although he is a rock, not as Christ is a rock, but as Peter is a rock. For Christ is by His very being an immovable rock; Peter only through this rock. Christ imparts His gifts, and is not exhaustedβ¦. He is a priest, and makes priests. He is a rock, and constitutes a rockβ (Hom. de Poenitentia, n. 4 in Appendice opp. S. Basilii [attributed to St. Basil])
Pope Leo XIII teaches that Christ is the Rock on which the Church is founded, just as Christ is also the Head of the Church. But Peter and his successors are each Rock and Head due to their mystical unity with Christ. Peter is Head and Rock only through Christ. Since the Church is the body of Christ, Peter alone cannot be its Head; Christ must be the Head of His own body. But Christ gifted the Church with a visible Head, united to himself as one Head, and the same for the foundational Rock of the Church. That Rock is Peter and his successors, not Peter alone historically, but Peter in his successors. But Peter can only be the foundational Rock of the Body of Christ through Christ, the Cornerstone of the Church. These are not two different roles, Cornerstone and Rock. Rather, Christ is the Rock or Cornerstone (in Hebrew βHead of the Cornerβ) and so is Peter, through his mystical unity with Christ.
Forwarded from βπ£π π₯ βππ₯π
My friends
If you spend more time here than in Church, we arenβt solving anything
Go to Adoration, Daily Masses, Confession, speak to your Priest about your vocation, there should be no reason why you shouldnβt know your Priests name and vice versa.
Get off this app and pray the Rosary
I can post a million Reasons why to be Catholic
But if you donβt put it in action everything is pointless
If you spend more time here than in Church, we arenβt solving anything
Go to Adoration, Daily Masses, Confession, speak to your Priest about your vocation, there should be no reason why you shouldnβt know your Priests name and vice versa.
Get off this app and pray the Rosary
I can post a million Reasons why to be Catholic
But if you donβt put it in action everything is pointless